Analysts Split on Palantir’s A.I. Goals: Bull vs. Bear Views in 2023.
Palantir Technologies has revised its annual revenue target, signalling its intent to capitalize on the commercialization of artificial intelligence (A.I.). However, opinions among analysts remain divided on the company’s A.I. ambitions.
CEO Alex Karp emphasized Palantir’s strategy to monetize A.I. rather than confining it to creating tools like computer-generated poetry.

This stance contrasts with some companies, such as OpenAI, which have restricted the use of similar devices.
Karp expressed confidence in Palantir’s ability to harness the potential of its artificial intelligence platform (AIP), which is designed to provide businesses, defence entities, and military organizations with access to large language models and AI-driven insights to enhance decision-making processes.
Dan Ives, the managing director at Wedbush Securities, holds an optimistic view of Palantir’s A.I. aspirations. He labelled AIP as a “star” and commended Palantir for its potential to monetize A.I. in the government sector and within enterprises.
Ives highlighted the recent announcement of a substantial contract awarded to Palantir by the U.S. Special Operations Command, amounting to $463 million over five years. He sees this development as an inflexion point and envisions Palantir as a prominent player in the A.I. landscape for the foreseeable future.
![]()
Wedbush’s note conveyed that Palantir engages with over 300 enterprises to deploy its A.I. platform, reflecting strong demand for efficient and secure solutions integrating advanced language models into internal systems and proprietary data.
The firm reiterated its positive outlook on Palantir, maintaining an “outperform” rating and projecting a price target of $25, which suggests a potential 39% increase from the stock’s recent closing price of $17.99.
In contrast, Rishi Jaluria, the managing director at RBC Capital Markets, holds a more sceptical perspective, deeming Palantir’s valuation significantly lower.
RBC Capital Markets assigned an “underperform” rating to the stock and set a price target of $5, indicating a potential downside of approximately 72% from the recent closing price.

Jaluria questioned Palantir’s positioning as a leader in generative A.I., stating that the company’s A.I. offerings seem to be somewhat different from its existing services and technology.
Despite its claims to the contrary, he expressed doubts about Palantir’s ability to add substantial value in the field of generative A.I. Jaluria pointed out that while Palantir may promote its A.I. capabilities to CEOs and CIOs, its impact on the company’s performance and revenue remains uncertain.
He cautioned against a “self-fulfilling prophecy risk,” suggesting that Palantir’s repeated assertions of A.I. prowess could attract new customers and business opportunities based on perception rather than concrete results.
According to Jaluria, this dynamic might inflate expectations without corresponding gains in actual numbers. He warned that this could present a short-term risk for investors, potentially leading to an unfavourable outcome if the anticipated growth does not materialize.

In conclusion, Palantir Technologies’ decision to monetise A.I. has sparked opposing opinions among analysts.
While some, like Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities, view Palantir as a leading force in A.I. with the potential for significant monetization, others, such as Rishi Jaluria of RBC Capital Markets, question the company’s differentiation in the generative A.I. landscape and express scepticism about the potential short-term risks associated with inflated expectations.
The divergence in perspectives underscores the complex and evolving nature of Palantir’s A.I. ambitions and the challenges it may encounter as it seeks to position itself in the rapidly advancing A.I. market.








