Kemi Badenoch: UK to Benefit from CPTPP Trade Deal.
“Kemi Badenoch Signs CPTPP Trade Deal, Highlighting Potential Benefits for the UK Economy”
After finalizing the trade deal with CPTPP, which encompasses approximately 500 million individuals, Kemi Badenoch has emphasized the potential advantages for the United Kingdom.
Although experts predict only marginal gains for the UK economy, Ms Badenoch, speaking on the Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg program, emphasized that the critical factor lies in how businesses effectively utilize the agreement.
Established in 2018, the CPTPP comprises Brunei, Australia, Chile, Japan Canada, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam. Membership in this partnership eases trade restrictions among participants and reduces tariffs on various goods, which are border taxes.
By joining this group, the UK aims to enhance its exports by cutting tariffs on products such as dairy and meat, cars, gin, and whisky.
With a combined income accounting for roughly 13% of the global total, the CPTPP members present significant economic opportunities. Moreover, the UK has achieved an important milestone by becoming the first European country to join this trade bloc.
Nevertheless, according to the government’s estimates, being part of the CPTPP is projected to contribute a mere 0.08% to the UK’s economy over a decade.
“UK Commits to Joining Asia’s Trade Club – Exploring CPTPP”

Despite previous forecasts by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) suggesting that Brexit would lead to a long-term reduction of approximately 4% in the UK’s potential economic growth, Kemi Badenoch, a prominent government figure, expressed optimism about the potential impact of CPTPP.
Ms Badenoch disputed the government’s estimate of the agreement’s influence, stating that it needs to consider future growth prospects and the importance of effectively utilizing the deal.

In her remarks, Ms Badenoch emphasized that if the UK fails to capitalize on the benefits of the CPTPP, it could become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
She highlighted the enormous potential derived from joining the CPTPP, describing the Asia Pacific region as the fastest-growing area expected to account for at least 50% of global growth until 2035.
While the decision to join the CPTPP has been made, the treaty still needs scrutiny and ratification by its members before coming into effect. This process could take approximately one year.

“UK Signs CPTPP Trade Deal with Mixed Reactions and Considerations for Workers, Standards, and Farmers”
As the UK government announced the signing of CPTPP, it highlighted that CPTPP-affiliated businesses employ approximately 400,000 individuals nationwide.
Additionally, the government noted that although CPTPP companies represent only 0.3% of all businesses in the UK, they contribute 6.1% of the total turnover, showcasing their economic significance.
The BCC, a business lobby group, welcomed the deal, stating that it provides favourable opportunities for UK businesses to enter or expand their trade in CPTPP member markets.

Specifically, the potential benefits for small- and medium-sized enterprises, including reduced costs for importing components from member countries to be used in manufactured goods for export.
However, there have been expressions of doubt and concern.
The general secretary of the TUC trade union body, Paul Nowak, criticized the pact, claiming it is detrimental to domestic and international workers. Nowak accused Conservative ministers of disregarding human and workers’ rights abuses in pursuit of trade agreements.
Concerns have also been raised regarding the UK’s ability to ensure compliance with environmental and animal welfare standards.
Dame Sharon White, the chair of the John Lewis Partnership, stressed the importance of understanding the impact on British farmers and safeguarding the country’s high animal welfare standards. She expressed the need to avoid undercutting British farmers and the longstanding animal welfare standards upheld in the country.
In summary, while signing the CPTPP is viewed as a positive development, opinions on its overall impact vary. Some anticipate limited substantial changes, while others raise concerns about workers’ rights, standards, and the potential effects on British farmers and animal welfare.







